Anti Hindi Agitation In Andhra
anti hindi agitation in andhra pradesh
The anti-Hindi agitations are anti-Delhi and anti-Centre, not necessarily against north India, says Narendar Pani, professor at the National Institute of Advanced Studies in Bengaluru.. Nor did they try to explain why the party and the government reached the decision. https://hicurxelscont.over-blog.com/2021/03/Xmeye-For-Mac.html
anti hindi agitation in andhra pradesh
The anti-Hindi agitation can also become anti-Malayalam or anti-Tamil, depending on where you are.. Barring 16 years of Telugu Desam Party, the state always has been ruled by Congress chief ministers since independence.. According to one biographer, Indira Gandhi, who was the Union information and broadcasting minister in former prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastris cabinet, decided to fly down to Madras (now Chennai) to quell the trouble' when Tamil Nadu was boiling with anti-Hindi agitation in 1965.. The Congress leadership has forgotten that the people of Andhra Pradesh have always backed the party in crucial times. Click
In other similar instances, Indira Gandhi, by visiting Tezpur in the midst of the India-China war and Kashmir valley in the mid-1960s when the secessionist movement was at its peak, tried to get first hand information on developments as well as to send a political message.. History of anti-Hindi agitation The first agitation against the imposition of Hindi in Tamil Nadu took place in 1937 when the Congress government led by C Rajagopalachari (Rajaji) asked for the introduction of compulsory teaching of Hindi in the schools of the Madras presidency. https://leotextvemed.shopinfo.jp/posts/15763506
But what does leadership mean? If the Congress Working Committee has taken a unanimous decision on the states bifurcation, what stops the Congress leadership from publicly defending it? What kind of political points do they want to earn from their silence? If maintaining silence and ignoring the developments is the trend that has been followed by governments at the Centre since the 1990s, why should not the Congress vice-president break that trend? Does a good leader follow the trend or set one?.. Ironically, Rao was an Andhraite After the apex decision making body of the Congress party, the Congress Working Committee (CWC), took a unanimous' decision to bifurcate Andhra Pradeshfor whatever political reason cited by the Grand Old Partyneither of the Gandhis tried to take the people of Seemandra region into confidence.. Congress leaders argue that the situation in Andhra Pradesh is fluid for the party leadership because they have to be sensitive to both sidesTelangana and Seemandra.. The Congress party leadership has goofed up again Ever since the party-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government began discussions on Telangana formation, both the government and the party leadership have been sending confused signals to the nation about their stance on it. 0041d406d9 Click
If either the Congress president, who is still revered as the most accepted leader in Andhra Pradesh, or Rahul Gandhi, who is expected to inspire the youth and lead the party in the upcoming electoral tests, go back to their family history, they will find that both Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi always tried to be in touch with the people in trouble-hit regions.. Both the Gandhis seem to have followed former Congress prime minister late P V Narasimha Raos political strategy of silence.. Shastri, meanwhile, adopted a wait-and-watch policy and many other senior party leaders, including K.. Kamaraj, who hailed from Tamil Nadu, decided to keep a distance from the violence-hit state.. Now when the other side of Andhra Pradesh is burning, Congress president Sonia Gandhi and vice-president Rahul Gandhi are deafeningly silent. HERE